Potential Even Work On Place Of Humans †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Potential Even Work On Place Of Humans? Answer: Introduction With the vast technological innovations, there is great threat to the humans or the working individuals. Man made technology is replacing humans from several jobs and work areas as these continuous updates and innovations are of high potential that can even work on the place of humans. The biggest threat imposed is from the robotic technology and artificial intelligence (AI) as several organisations are replacing human by these robots and have started taking extensive use of the robotic technology and artificial intelligence for managing the business operations and activities (Pressreader, 2017). From the article, it has also been analyzed that even for the purpose of greeting there are robots. The article highlights that there is a significant trend that soon there will be driverless cars and there will be soon robotic availability of smart and cheap robots for managing maximum of the business function by decreasing the dependency upon the humans (Latar, 2015). The paper will presen t the analysis of the case with several ethical lenses using various ethical theories. Utilitarianism Theory The first theoretical aspect which can explain the ethicality or un-ethically of the case highlighted in the article is the Utilitarian Ethical Theory. According to this theory, the decisions and they actions of the organisations or the individuals must be in relevance with the approach of offering high level of advantages to the maximum number of masses. But the use of robotic technology and artificial intelligence has a contradictory perspective as these activities are primarily undertaken for benefitting few sections of the society. There is violation of the Utilitarian theory as there is only a limited set of people who are getting positive outcomes from the use of robots such as the involved organisations, investors, etc. (Shafer-Landau, 2012). But there are negative impacts upon the human as they are losing their significance and jobs due to artificial technologies and increasing the rate of unemployment in the society which is overall hampering the success of the masses and th e governments too (Komlos, 2016). There is also a negative impact upon the environment in terms of taking sue of high power technologies and positing harmful impact upon the sustainability of the environment. Secondly the robots and AI will take away the jobs of thousands of people which will affect them and their livelihood in the most in-depth negative sense (Veruggio, Operto and Bekey, 2013). Thus, from the overall analysis, such technological innovations are against the approach and ethical aspect of the Utilitarian ethical theory. Deontology Theory The second theoretical aspect which can explain the ethicality or un-ethically of the case highlighted in the article is the Deontological theory. According to this theory, it is obligatory that the organisations at the time of decision making must have a strict follow up of their responsibilities. It is necessary to remain ethical and concerning in respect with the other individuals and society while developing any kind of product or service so that those individuals do not have to suffer consequences as its aftermath. Thus being conscious about ones own action is must as per the deontological based ethical theory (Broad, 2014). The individuals and the organisations following the aspects of deontological theory have a probability of making more ethical decisions which are beneficial both for the societies and the individuals. In respect with the article, the use of robots and AI by several organisations is termed as unethical because of the reason that such technological innovations are hampering the livelihood of the humans as they are going jobless due to the extended use of such technologies by the organisations by replacing humans (Ford, 2015). Being aware of the negative consequences imposed upon the society and the earning source of the individuals, the organizations are taking use of the technology which is a direct violation of the ethical aspects of the deontological theory. Thus, it can be analyzed that such activities are self-centric and are unethical and threatening to the livelihood and the earning of the individuals (Rotman, 2013). Virtue Theory The third theoretical aspect which can explain the ethicality or un-ethically of the case highlighted in the article is the Virtue theory. As per this theory, it is necessary that the operational and business functions of the organisations must be reliable, true and ethical in nature. There are few character related inherent aspects of the individuals that explain the appropriate and correct behavior of the individuals making any decision (LaFollette and Persson, 2013). In the article, the use of the robotic technology and artificial intelligence is the key decisions of the higher authorities of the organisations and thus they have complete involvement in the decision making process of replacing human with robots and stealing their jobs. The key executive and administrative department has a complete knowledge of the consequences of such actions but then also instead of taking corrective actions to save the jobs of the individuals with the use of robots and AI, they are replacing huma ns and thus it is an unethical practice of the organizations which deteriorate the aspects of the virtue theory (Pannu, 2015). Thus, the use of technology is not unethical but the intention and the replacing of humans as well as taking their jobs is highly unethical which are against the ethical virtues. To have a successful implementation, it is essential that such actions must not take place and all the acts of the organisations must be ethically upright (Anderson, 2016). Contract Theory The next theoretical aspect which can explain the ethicality or un-ethically of the case highlighted in the article is the Contract theory. It is a theory which is a combined theoretical of utilitarian, deontological and virtue theory. As per this theory, there is a social-contract aspect where there are contractual agreements which are governed by the aspects of virtue i.e. good behavior and the organisations are required to work as per these agreement or contract (LaFollette and Persson, 2013). The theory offers a motivation for being moral and ethical while involving in any kind of operation or activity. In respect with the article, the decision of taking use of the robots by several organisations is termed as unethical as from such actions of the organisations there is a social contract of offering a secured and responsible living to the individuals but as these robots and AI will replace the humans thus, the social contract will be violated. And thus, from the view point and eth ical aspects of the social-contract theory also the replacing of human by robots resulting in loss of job by the individuals is against the ethical perspectives (Bostrom and Yudkowsky, 2014). Conclusion Being ethical and morally upright is the one of the essentials of any business organisation and its operations. In present scenario, it is extremely required that every business action must be ethical; if analyzed by the ethical lenses such as by comparing with the ethical theories of Utilitarianism, deontology, virtue and social contract theory. All these theories explained the aspects on which the actions or the decisions of the individuals are evaluated that whether these actions are beneficial for the maximum number of the individuals or not and what all other impacts are posing upon the society and the environment. Thus, from the paper and several discussion, it can be concluded that from the technological and organisational point of view, the use of robots and artificial intelligence is ethical but from the ethical perspective in context with the human and the societies, it is unethical and before implementing such practices, the organisations must take initiatives to save the jobs of the individuals and offer them adequate working opportunities. Thus, after such initiatives there can be attained ethicality in the business operations. References Anderson, S. L. (2016). Are we ready to replace humans with machines. Bostrom, N., Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence.The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence, 316-334. Broad, C. D. (2014).Five types of ethical theory(Vol. 2). Routledge. Ford, M. (2015).The rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of mass unemployment. Oneworld Publications. Komlos, J. (2016). Has Creative Destruction Become More Destructive?.The BE Journal of Economic Analysis Policy,16(4). LaFollette, H., Persson, I. (Eds.). (2013).The Blackwell guide to ethical theory. John Wiley Sons. Latar, N. L. (2015). The robot journalist in the age of social physics: the end of human journalism?. InThe New World of Transitioned Media(pp. 65-80). Springer International Publishing. Pannu, A. (2015). Artificial intelligence and its application in different areas.Artificial Intelligence,4(10). Pressreader, (2017). What if robots and AI takes our jobs? Retrieved on: 13th September, 2017, Retrieved from: https://www.pressreader.com/canada/waterloo-region-record/20170422/281758449172066 Rotman, D. (2013). How technology is destroying jobs.Technology Review,16(4), 28-35. Shafer-Landau, R. (Ed.). (2012).Ethical theory: an anthology(Vol. 13). John Wiley Sons. Veruggio, G., Operto, F., Bekey, G. (2016). Roboethics: Social and ethical implications. InSpringer handbook of robotics(pp. 2135-2160). Springer International Publishing.